From our Legal Corner - tomorrow's cases
Legal Corner Icon — the image was hosted by the publisher and was not captured.Income Tax
Raghav Bahl case - Income or transactions not disclosed on or before date of search - would not have been disclosed but for the search - to be treated as undisclosed income : ITAT
IT all started with search and seizure operation conducted at the premises of Friends Portfolio. In the course of the search, statements of Shri Manoj Agarwal and other persons were recorded and thereafter assessment was completed in their cases. It was found that all the transactions undertaken by Shri Manoj Agarwal through Friends Portfolio and his other concerns were bogus transactions, in the nature of merely providing entries without any real physical transactions relatable to those entries.
Customs
As per Regulation 8 of CHALR, 2004, examinations are to be conducted twice a year which means to say four exams in two years - Appellant to be given two more chances to clear the exam for continuing with CHA licence : Tribunal
After the death of the proprietor, his legal heir was granted permission to work as a Customs House Agent, in terms of Regulation 16(2) of the Regulations subject to her passing the examination referred to in Regulation 8 of the CHALR, 2004 within two years i.e by 10/03/2006. An examination was held on 29.9.2005, in which she was declared failed. She re-appeared for the written examination held on 7/8/2006 when again she was shown as failed. This is what transpired before the Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai declared the CHA licence inoperative with immediate effect vide order dated 15.12.2006.
Central Excise
Excise valuation in 1991 - discount allowed even if a small part of sale did not have same discount as majority of sales; Abatement from retail price has to be allowed for calculating AV - when factory gate price is ascertainable, depot price cannot be taken as value : Supreme Court
THE short point which arises for determination in these civil appeals filed by the assessee is - Whether the assessee was entitled to 20% trade discount.
DDT Thanks!
DDT gratefully acknowledges the Netizens who took time off to send their greetings on the occasion of the 700th DDT. DDT regrets its inability to send individual replies to all the netizens and this may kindly be treated as personal replies. DDT humbly requests your continued support and response.
With that rather longish DDT
Until tomorrow with more DDT
Have a nice day.
Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com