TIOL-DDT 2844 · Thursday, 12 May 2016 · story 5 of 6

Income Tax -Kaun Banega Crorepati - Revenue Wins Against Amitabh Bachchan in Supreme Court

YESTERDAY the Supreme Court upset the decisions of the ITAT and High Court in a Revenue Appeal against Amitab Bachchan.

The assessee, Amitabh Bachchan in the re-revised return dated 31st March, 2003 had made a claim of additional expenses of 30% of the gross professional receipts (Rs.3.17 crores). It appears that the Assessing Officer required the assessee to file requisite details in this regard. The assessee responded by letter dated 13th February, 2004 stating:

“With regard to the 30% estimated expenses claimed, we have to submit that these are the expenses which are spent for security purposes by employing certain Agencies, guards etc. for the personal safety of Shri Bachchan as he has to protect himself from various threats to his life received by him and to avoid extortion of money from gangsters. The names of such Agencies cannot be disclosed/divulged as there is a possibility of leakage of information of Agencies' names from the office staff, which will obviously be detrimental to the interests of Shri Bachchan. The payments have been made out of cash balances available and lot of outstanding expenses are to be paid which could not be paid for want of income.”

For more details, please see

cited in this story