Abatement of 75% - Not admissible for works contracts?
IT appears that Construction service has always been a complex matter to understand. While the service has seen a record number of disputes on various issues till 01.07.2012, even after the introduction of negative list, the uncertainties remain. As per Notification No 26/2012 ST dated 20.06.2012 (Sl No 12), service tax is payable on 25% or 30% of the value subject to certain conditions. Apparently, the abatement of 75% or 70% allowed is towards the value of materials used in the service as there will be transfer of property in construction service. From 01.07.2012, service tax is payable on works contracts in respect of original works on 40% of the value of the contract (Rule 2A(ii) of Service Tax - Determination of value Rules, 2006). In majority of cases, the tax payable under Notification No 26/2012 ST will be less than the tax payable under Rule 2A(ii). It appears the department is raising demand notices for the differential tax in such cases where the tax is paid under Notification No 26/2012 ST. This raises some fundamental questions which perhaps the Board should address:
1. Can a builder of residential complex not pay service tax by availing abatement under Notification No 26/2012 ST if the service is works contract?
2. If not, what is the reason? If all works contracts are to be taxed only under Rule 2A, where is the need for entry No 12 in 26/2012 ST? Can Board explain with illustration what are the cases covered under Notification No 26/2012 ST?
3. Is it not a fact that the abatement of 75% or 70% allowed under Notification No 26/2012 ST is towards transfer of property in goods while rendering construction service? If not, what does this 70% or 75% abatement represent?