TIOL-DDT 2254 · Wednesday, 18 December 2013 · story 4 of 9

'Profits and gains of business or profession' - Section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act - Conflicting Judicial Decisions - CBDT clarifies

IT has been brought to the notice of the Board that there are conflicting interpretations by judicial authorities regarding the applicability of the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') with regard to the amount not deductible in computing the income chargeable under the head 'Profits and gains of business or profession".

In the case of Merilyn Shipping & Transports v. Addl. CIT - 2012-TIOL-184-ITAT-VIZAG-SB, it was held by Special Bench of ITAT, Vishakhapatnam, that the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act would apply only to the amount which remained payable at the end of the relevant financial year and could not be invoked to disallow the amount which had actually been paid during the previous year without deduction of tax at source. The order of the Special Bench has since been put under interim suspension by the Andhra Pradesh High Court.

The Calcutta High Court and Gujarat High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax, Kolkata-XI v. Crescent Exports Syndicate () and Commissioner of Income-tax-IV v. Sikandarkhan N Tunvar () respectively, have held that section 40(a)(ia) of the Act would cover not only the amounts which are payable at the end of the previous year but also which are payable at any time during the year.

After careful examination of the issue, the Board is of the considered view that the provision of section 40(a) (ia) of the Act would cover not only the amounts which are payable as on 31st March of a previous year but also amounts which are payable at any time during the year. The statutory provisions are amply clear and in the context of section 40(a) (ia) of the Act the term "payable" would include "amounts which are paid during the previous year".

Board further clarifies that where any High Court decides an issue contrary to the 'Departmental View', the 'Departmental View' thereon shall not be operative in the area falling in the jurisdiction of the relevant High Court.

CBDT Circular No. 10/DV/2013, Dated:December 16, 2013

cited in this story