SAL STEEL LIMITED – referred to Third Member
RECENTLY we had carried the above case in our portal. We had been informed by some very concerned and vigilant netizens that the order we carried was not the final one and was the judgement of only one of the judges. As the other Judge had differed the matter was referred to the Third Member. On further enquiries we have found that the matter was indeed referred to a third Member, though the copy of the judgement with us did not mention anything about the difference of opinion between the two members of the Bench. And the order of the dissenting Member does not seem to be in public domain.
Anyway the position now is that the matter is with the Third Member and we will have to wait for the final outcome. We regret the confusion caused inadvertently and we profusely thank the Netizens who brought the matter to our notice.