the essay of 10 June 2026 · the untouched capture
Rendered as it looked. Links and images are disabled in this view; the file itself is untouched.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> <html> <head> <title>Untitled Document</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong><font color="#663399">JUNE 10, 2026</font></strong></font></p> <p align="center"><font color="#FF6633" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong> Habeas Corpus: Because Someone Forgot the DIN Again</strong></font></p> <p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong><u>By Vijay Kumar</u></strong></font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>IN </strong>Criminal Appeal No. 838 of 2021, the Supreme Court observed: </font></p> <blockquote><p align="justify"><em><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="background-color:#f3dbcf">We may note that personal liberty is an important aspect of our constitutional mandate. The occasion to arrest an accused during investigation arises when custodial investigation becomes necessary or it is a heinous crime or where there is a possibility of influencing the witnesses or accused may abscond. Merely because an arrest can be made because it is lawful does not mandate that arrest must be made. A distinction must be made between the existence of the power to arrest and the justification for exercise of it. If arrest is made routine, it can cause incalculable harm to the reputation and self-esteem of a person. If the Investigating Officer has no reason to believe that the accused will abscond or disobey summons and has, in fact, throughout cooperated with the investigation we fail to appreciate why there should be a compulsion on the officer to arrest the accused. </font></em></p></blockquote> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This sentence of the Supreme Court deserves to be printed on mugs, mousepads, and the walls of GST offices: </font></p> <blockquote><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="background-color:#f3dbcf">Merely because an arrest can be made because it is lawful does not mandate that arrest must be made. </font></p></blockquote> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In simpler English:<strong><em> "Just because you can doesn't mean you should." </em></strong></font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The Court reminded officers that arrest is an exception, not a recreational activity. It should be used only when custodial interrogation is essential, the crime is heinous, or the accused is likely to abscond. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">If the accused is cooperating, the Court basically asks: <em><strong>"Why are you arresting him? For sport?" </strong></em></font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">CBIC, inspired by this judicial wisdom, issued <a href="https://taxindiaonline.com/gst/details?id=29778&view=notification&type=notification" target="_blank">Instruction No. 02/2022-23 (GST - Investigation); Dated: August 17, 2022 </a> - a beautifully drafted document full of noble intentions. It reads like a human rights manual that accidentally wandered into the GST ecosystem. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>CBIC's Ideal World Before Arrest </strong></font></p> <blockquote><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">-<em> "Reasons to believe"</em> must be unambiguous and based on credible material. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">- No arrest in technical disputes (which, in GST, is 90% of disputes). </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">- Arrest only for masterminds, fraudsters, and chronic summons dodgers. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">- DIN - Document Identification Number - mandatory. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">- Minimal force, minimal publicity - maximum paperwork. </font></p></blockquote> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">If implemented, this would make India a tax - administration utopia - the kind found only in training manuals. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>And then reality walks in - without a DIN. </strong></font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Now the moot question is whether all these lofty ideals are followed in the field. Look at this recent case from the Allahabad High Court: <em>Ashish Tyagi v Director General Of GST Intelligence in HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 509 of 2026 </em>= <a href="https://taxindiaonline.com/searchcaselaw/details?id=193176&type=caselaw&keyword=null" target="_blank"> <em> <strong>2026-TIOL-736-HC-ALL-GST</strong></em></a>: </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The writ petitioner prayed for: </font></p> <blockquote><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">1. Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the corpus/petitioner while declaring the detention, arrest, and subsequent remand and custody of the petitioner as unconstitutional, illegal and arbitrary and consequently the petitioner be released forthwith; </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">2. Setting aside the order dated 18.02.2026 passed by <em>Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut in Case No. 2122/2025, Union of India vs. Ashish Tyagi</em>, under the CGST Act of the DGGI, Ghaziabad and all consequential proceedings thereof; </font></p></blockquote> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">It was submitted that in the present case, </font></p> <blockquote><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">- Neither the grounds of arrest have been mentioned in the arrest memo nor have the grounds of arrest been supplied which is in clear violation of Circular No. 02/2022-2023 issued by the CGST Department. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">- The arrest memo merely records that the grounds of arrest were explained to the arrestee. However, there was no recital to indicate that the grounds of arrest were supplied to the petitioner. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">- The columns (i) to (iv) of the jama talashi were kept blank and the signatures of the petitioner were obtained thereon. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">- Remand Magistrate failed to consider the aforesaid discrepancies and illegally granted remand of the petitioner. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">- Hence, the arrest and detention of the petitioner are illegal and the petitioner is entitled to be released forthwith. </font></p></blockquote> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The Department filed a counter affidavit but were unable to rebut the submissions of the petitioner by placing any material or document on record. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The High Court perused the arrest memo, which did not disclose the place of arrest of the petitioner, in violation of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of <em>D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal (reported in <strong><a href="https://taxindiaonline.com/searchcaselaw/details?id=12325&type=caselaw&keyword=null" target="_blank">2002-TIOL-230-SC-MISC</a></strong>.)</em> </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The High Court further found that the grounds of arrest did not bear any DIN. The petitioner has been made to endorse on the arrest memo that he had received the arrest memo along with the grounds of arrest and that he had informed his friend, about his arrest through a mobile phone call. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The High Court noted that the submission of the petitioner that, in terms of Circular issued by the CGST Department, every document is required to bear a DIN, has not been controverted by the respondents. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Therefore, it is evident that the petitioner has been illegally detained by respondents in violation of the mandate of law. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In view of the above consideration, the High Court held the arrest and detention of petitioner to be illegal and he was directed to be released forthwith. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em><strong>The Catch</strong></em> - This does not mean Tyagi is now free to roam the countryside. The Court quashed the arrest primarily because the paperwork lacked a DIN and proper procedure. The Department is totally free to arrest him all over again - provided they find a functioning printer to put a proper DIN on the memo this time. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">But when can a HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION be filed in case of arrest? The same Allahabad High Court, two days before the above judgement in <em>HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. 218 of 2026; Niraj v State of UP</em> = <em><strong><a href="https://tiolcorplaws.com/caselaw/details/NzkzNg==" target="_blank">2026-TIOLCORP-53-HC-ALL-MISC</a></strong></em> held: </font></p> <blockquote><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">(i) A habeas corpus writ petition can be preferred by an accused, at the earliest, if his initial remand is illegal and consequently his detention is illegal. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">(ii) The filing of habeas corpus petition shall not be affected by rejection of bail application of the accused by the trial court only. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">(iii) Rejection of bail application of accused by High Court or the Supreme Court, would be a bar to entertainment of habeas corpus since the bail application has been considered by the Bench of the High Court or the Supreme Court and it would not be proper for another coordinate Bench of the High Court or the Supreme Court, where the bail application was rejected, to entertain a habeas corpus writ petition by another Bench of the same court. It will amount to appeal / review of the judgment passed by the Bench deciding bail application of the accused. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">(iv) Once the charge sheet is submitted against an accused and judicial order of cognizance is passed thereon by the competent court, the right of the accused to prefer habeas corpus writ petition on the ground that the initial judicial order of remand passed by the Magistrate was illegal would not be maintainable. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">(v) After the cognizance is taken on the charge sheet submitted by the investigating officer, the challenge to arrest of accused can be made on the grounds of violation of Article 21 and 22(1) of the Constitution of India by resorting to statutory remedy of bail provided under the statute. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">(vi) The remedy of filing habeas corpus petition will also not be available to an accused after the order of committal or remand. </font></p><p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">(vii) Even after framing of charge by the court, which is also a judicial order amenable to statutory challenge, the remedy of habeas corpus cannot be availed by an accused. </font></p></blockquote> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">There is a Supreme Court Judgement and there is a Board Circular. Why are these not followed in the field? </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In the <em>DK Basu</em> case, the Supreme Court issued the requirements to be followed in all cases of arrest or detention: </font></p> <table align="center" border="1" cellpadding="03" cellspacing="0" style="width:90%"> <tbody> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>Identification </strong></font></div> </td> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Arresting and interrogating officers must wear clear, accurate, and visible name tags showing their designations. </font></div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>The Arrest Memo </strong></font></div> </td> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Must be prepared at the time of arrest, recording the exact time and date. It must be countersigned by the arrestee and attested by at least one witness (a family member or a respectable local citizen). </font></div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>Notification </strong></font></div> </td> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The arrestee must be informed of their right to have a friend or relative notified of their custody as soon as they are detained. </font></div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>Station Diary </strong></font></div> </td> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A detailed entry must be made at the place of detention recording the arrest, who was informed, and the names of the officers in charge of custody. </font></div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>Medical Care </strong></font></div> </td> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">If the arrestee requests it, a major/minor injury inspection memo must be drawn up at the time of arrest and signed by both parties. The arrestee must undergo a medical examination by an approved panel doctor every 48 hours. </font></div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>Legal Access </strong></font></div> </td> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The arrestee is permitted to meet his lawyer during interrogation (though not continuously throughout the entire session). </font></div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>Control Room </strong></font></div> </td> <td style="vertical-align:top"> <div align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Information regarding the arrest and venue of custody must be sent to the District/State Police Control Room within 12 hours and displayed prominently on a notice board. </font></div> </td> </tr> </tbody></table> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">These are not "best practices. These are mandatory requirements, with consequences. Any officer who cuts corners faces immediate departmental action and can be personally punished for contempt of court. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">So, the ultimate question remains: If a tax offence is severe enough that you absolutely must arrest someone, is it really that difficult to just follow the Supreme Court's directions and your own Board's circular? </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Neither the Supreme Court nor the CBIC write these guidelines for their own entertainment. They issue them so that individual personal liberty is treated with the constitutional respect it deserves-rather than being treated by the field formation as a minor, annoying clerical inconvenience. After all, if you have the power to take away a citizen's freedom, the least you can do is make sure your printer has ink. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><img src="https://admin.taxindiaonline.com/UploadedFiles/Customs/CaseLaws/2026/JestGST_090626.JPG" style="height:376px; width:579px"/></font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Liberty shouldn't depend on toner levels. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font color="#ff0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Until next week</font></p> <p align="justify"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Comments/feedback welcome at <a href="mailto:vijaywrite@tiol.in" target="_blank">vijaywrite@tiol.in </a> or 9848111243 (WhatsApp) </font></p> </body> </html>