the essay of 31 March 2021 · the untouched capture
Rendered as it looked. Links and images are disabled in this view; the file itself is untouched.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> <html> <head> <title>Untitled Document</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> </head> <body> <p align="left"><font color="#663399" size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>MARCH 31, 2021</strong></font></p> <p align="center"><font color="#FF6633" size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>An impossible retrospective amendment</strong></font></p> <p align="center"><u><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>By Vijay Kumar</strong></font></u></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>THE</STRONG> political theorist Jean-Louis de Lolme in his 1771 book on the English constitution stated, <em>"Parliament can do everything but make a woman a man and a man a woman."</em> The bright bureaucrats of India who draft laws for the Parliament to pass, must be having a similar opinion.</font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Section 245 C of the Income Tax Act deals with application for settlement of cases to the Settlement Commission to have the case settled.</font></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Application for settlement of cases. </strong></font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>245C. </strong>(1) An assessee may, at any stage of a case relating to him, <em>make an application </em> in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed, and containing a full and true disclosure of his income which has not been disclosed before the Assessing Officer, the manner in which such income has been derived, the additional amount of income-tax payable on such income and such other particulars as may be prescribed, to the Settlement Commission to have the case settled and any such application shall be disposed of in the manner hereinafter provided: </font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Provided </strong> that no such application shall be made unless,- </font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">xxxxx </font></p> </blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Finance Bill 2021 by Clause 59, proposed to amend this Section 245C, by adding a new clause</font></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">59. In section 245C of the Income-tax Act, after subsection (4), the following sub-section shall be inserted and <em>shall be deemed to have been inserted with effect from the 1st day of February, 2021</em>, namely: -</font></p> <p align="justify"><em><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">"(5) No application shall be made under this section on or after the 1st day of February, 2021.".</font></em></p> </blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">This virtually abolished the Settlement Commission retrospectively with effect from 1st February 2021. See the language - no application SHALL be made….. What will they do if an application is made? How can they say somebody shall not make an application? Is it an offence and that too a retrospective one to make an application?</font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Suppose they make a law on 28th March 2021 that:</font></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1. No application for driving licence shall be made or after the 1st day of February, 2021 </font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2. No appeal shall be made to the Tribunal on or after the 1st day of February, 2021 </font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">3. No application shall be made for refund of GST on or after the 1st day of February, 2021 </font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">4. No application for advance ruling under GST shall be made on or after the 1st day of February, 2021</font></p> </blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The amendment that <em>No application shall be made under this section on or after the 1st day of February, 2021</em>, was proposed in the Finance <strong><a href="https://taxindiaonline.com/RC2/notDesc.php?MpoQSrPnM=Mjc4MTI=" target="_blank">Bill 2021</a></strong> presented to Parliament on 1st February 2021. Lo and behold! the Settlement Commission stopped taking applications from 1st February. All those assessees who had time till 31st March 2021 to file applications before the Settlement Commission, were shocked and as the only remedy, they queued up to the High Courts.</font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Telangana High Court in an order dated 16.02.2021, observed,</font></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">From the above submissions it could be seen that the Finance Bill seeking to insert sub-section 5 to Section 245-C of the Act, prohibiting to file settlement applications after 01.02.2021, is introduced in the Lok Sabha, and as on today the bill is not passed, and it has not received the assent of the President and no notification has been issued. Therefore, Section 245-C of the Act, as it stands as on today, is applicable.</font></p> </blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">In another order dated 15.02.2021, the same High Court had observed,</font></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">In the present case nothing has happened and the statute remains on the statute book. The 3rd respondent is obligated to receive the application as long as the statute is valid and subsisting.</font></p> </blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">And in several other orders, the High Court stayed the assessments and directed the Settlement Commission to receive the applications filed by the assessees. Fairly enough, the Settlement Commission accepted the applications from those assessees who had High Court orders directing the Commission to accept their applications. Notwithstanding the amendment proposed in the Finance Bill that <em>No application shall be made under this section on or after the 1st day of February, 2021. </em></font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">On 28th March 2021, the Finance Bill became the Finance <strong><a href="https://taxindiaonline.com//RC2/pdfdocs/finance_act/finance_act_21/Finance_Act_2021.pdf" target="_blank">Act 2021</a></strong>, with this provision remaining identically under Section 67 of the Act. </font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">So, as per Section 67 of the Finance Act 2021, which is LAW with full force,</font></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><em><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">"No application shall be made under this section on or after the 1st day of February, 2021.".</font></em></p> </blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">But the fact is that hundreds of applications have been made legally on the orders of High Courts. What will happen to them? They were filed after 1 st February 2021 and the present law prohibits that, but when they were filed, it was perfectly legal as per the law prevailing at the time of filing.</font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Will this have retrospective effect or is it retroactive?</font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">In <em>Jay Mahakali Rolling Mills vs Union of India </em> - <strong><a href="https://taxindiaonline.com/RC2/subCatDesc.php3?subCatDisp_Id=32&filename=legal/sc/2007/2007-TIOL-139-SC-CX.htm" target="_blank">2007-TIOL-139-SC-CX</a></strong>, the Supreme Court observed,</font></p> <blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>"Retrospective"</em> means looking backward, contemplating what is past, having reference to a statute or things existing before the Statute in question. Retrospective law means a law which looks backward or contemplates the past; one, which is made to affect acts or facts occurring, or rights occurring, before it comes into force. Retroactive statute means a statute, which creates a new obligation on transactions or considerations or destroys or impairs vested rights.</font></p> </blockquote> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Can the Government travel back in time and change an act which had been legally done? </font></p> <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Should law-making be so complicated?</font></p> <p align="justify"><font color="#FF0000" size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Until next week</strong></font></p> </body> </html>