the essay of 16 May 2018 · the untouched capture
Rendered as it looked. Links and images are disabled in this view; the file itself is untouched.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p align="left"><font color="#663399" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong><font size="2">MAY 16, 2018 </font></strong></font></p>
<p align="center"><font color="#FF6633" size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Malaysia to abolish GST</strong></font></p>
<p align="center"><strong><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><u>By Vijay Kumar </u></font></strong></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>MALAYSIA</STRONG> has a new Prime Minister, the oldest Prime Minister in the world – 92 year old Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, who has taken over as Prime Minister last week. One of the promises he made in his election manifesto was to abolish GST in Malaysia. GST was introduced in Malaysia from 1 st April 2015 and is currently levied at a uniform rate of 6%. The tax is hugely unpopular and a survey conducted last year revealed <em>inter alia </em>: </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- Underestimating the scale of work involved in adapting the IT system to deal with the new tax was costly and time consuming. </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- A lot of work had to be done to enhance and upgrade IT systems to meet the complex GST requirements. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- By and large, businesses were required to make significant accounting system adjustments to adequately handle GST compliance. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- As the GST was a business transformation exercise, it required a lot of work translating the GST requirement and applying them in a practical business environment. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- Lack of knowledge regarding tax rules, talent resourcing and IT system readiness are the main areas of concern. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- Trade needs to continue to stay updated both in terms of the changes in GST but also change to their business practices or processes that could impact GST. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- Unfortunately, as it is a transaction tax, there is no rewind button that allows you to go back and fix things. </font></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">And in 2018, just three years after GST came to Malaysia, the 92 year oldDr. Mahathir promises to abolish GST and he becomes the Prime Minister after a gap of fifteen years. And his Government is keen to fulfil the promise within 100 days. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">It cannot be said that the old doctor became the Prime Minister just by his promise to abolish GST, but that could be one of the strong factors that helped him to come back to power. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">In India, of course, GST is not an electoral issue, as has been proved in the recent elections. We have abundant patience and are capable of absorbing any tax terrorism. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font color="#FFCC00" size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"style="background-color:#6633FF" span="span"><strong>GST and the 15th Finance Commission: </strong></font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Notification issued by the president constituting the 15th Finance Commission, stipulates (among other things) that: </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>While making its recommendations, the Commission shall have regard, among other considerations, to: </em></font></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>The impact of the GST, including payment of compensation for possible loss of revenues for 5 years, and abolition of a number of cesses, earmarking thereof for compensation and other structural reforms programme, on the finances of Centre and States; </em></font></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>The Commission may consider proposing measurable performance-based incentives for States, at the appropriate level of government, in following areas: </em></font></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>(i) Efforts made by the States in expansion and deepening of tax net under GST. </em></font></p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Kerala Finance Minister Thomas Issac is not impressed. In an open letter to Finance Ministers of all States, he states, </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>The goods and services tax (GST) has further worsened vertical devolution due to the 50:50 sharing of taxes. You just read the ToR with respect to the GST where it is made out that the GST is going to adversely affect Central resources. The whole argument of an asymmetric GST burden is a joke </em>. </font></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Kerala Finance Minister got a surprising support from the former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram who tweeted, </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>Kerala FM's open letter on the ToR of the Fifteenth Finance Commission deserves support. I urge all State CMs and FMs to join hands to protest the Centre's attempt to violate the Constitution and wreck the federal system</em>.</font></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Please also see <a href="https://taxindiaonline.com/RC2/inside2.php3?filename=bnews_detail.php3&newsid=33476" target="_blank"><strong>Alter Finance Commission's TOR by invoking CCSR reports </strong></a></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"style="background-color:#6633FF" span="span"><strong><font color="#FFCC00">When will the Rip Van Winkleism stop and Union of India wake up to its duties and responsibilities to the justice delivery</font> <font color="#FFCC00">system?</font> </strong></font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Though this is not a case related to tax, I would like to extract here certain sentences from a judgement of the Supreme Court delivered a few weeks ago. </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- The couldn't-care-less and insouciant attitude of the Union of India with regard to litigation, particularly in the Supreme Court, has gone a little too far as this case illustrates. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- To ensure that the Union of India is far more circumspect, costs of Rs.1,00,000/- were imposed and it was observed that the Union of India must shape up its litigation policy. Unfortunately, the Union of India has learnt no lesson and has continued its non-cooperative attitude. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- The Union of India must appreciate that by pursuing frivolous or infructuous cases, it is adding to the burden of this Court and collaterally harming other litigants by delaying hearing of their cases through the sheer volume of numbers. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- If the Union of India cares little for the justice delivery system, it should at least display some concern for litigants, many of whom have to spend a small fortune in litigating in the Supreme Court. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- None of the pious platitudes in the National Litigation Policy have been followed indicating not only the Union of India's lack of concern for the justice delivery system but scant regard for its own National Litigation Policy. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- Nothing has been finalised by the Union of India for the last almost about 8 years and under the garb of ease of doing business, the judiciary is being asked to reform. The boot is really on the other leg. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- To make matters worse, in this appeal, the Union of India has engaged 10 lawyers, including an Additional Solicitor General and a Senior Advocate! This is as per the appearance slip submitted to the Registry of this Court. In other words, the Union of India has created a huge financial liability by engaging so many lawyers for an appeal whose fate can be easily imagined on the basis of existing orders of dismissal in similar cases. Yet the Union of India is increasing its liability and asking the taxpayers to bear an avoidable financial burden for the misadventure. Is any thought being given to this? </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- The real question is: When will the Rip Van Winkleism stop and Union of India wake up to its duties and responsibilities to the justice delivery system? </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- To say the least, this is an extremely unfortunate situation of unnecessary and avoidable burdening of this Court through frivolous litigation which calls for yet another reminder through the imposition of costs on the Union of India while dismissing this appeal. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- We hope that someday some sense, if not better sense, will prevail on the Union of India with regard to the formulation of a realistic and meaningful National Litigation Policy and what it calls ‘ease of doing business', which can, if faithfully implemented benefit litigants across the country. </font></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">This judgement should be circulated among all the tax officers and maybe, Revenue Boards should direct the taxmen to keep these observations in mind before rushing to the courts to file those frivolous appeals. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">But then babus don't really have any respect for the courts and litigation will continue merrily.</font></p>
</body>
</html>