TIOL-DDT 2926 · the untouched capture
Rendered as it looked. Links and images are disabled in this view; the file itself is untouched.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/inside2.php3?filename=bnews_detail.php3&newsid=26988"><img src="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/image/stories/limca_book2016.jpg" alt="DDT in Limca Book of Records - Third Time in a row" width="252" height="220" hspace="5" border="0" align="right" ></a></font><font color="#663399" size="3">TIOL-DDT 2926</font><br>
08 09 2016<br>
Thursday</strong></font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="3" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif"><strong><em><font color="#006600">? ? ?<br>
DDT Question - What is Constitutional Authority for levy of Service Tax?</font></em></strong></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>WHAT </strong>is the authority to levy Service Tax? How is the Central Government competent to collect Service Tax?</font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">I am grateful to the readers who responded to the DDT question. Several Departmental officers, advocates and Industry leaders sent in their answers.</font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">What prompted me to ask this question was the inadvertent remark of a leading consultant in a GST speech (there are too many people speaking on GST these days) recently that Service Tax is levied by virtue of the powers from Entry 92C in List 1 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution.</font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sharad Misra, a Superintendent of Central Excise wrote in:</font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>The authority to levy Service Tax is derived from List 1 entry 92C of Schedule VII of the Constitution of India.</em></font></p>
<p align="justify"><em><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Further as per Article 268A the Constitution also provides that Taxes on services shall be levied by the Government of India and such tax shall be collected and appropriated by the Government of India and the State in the manner provided.</font></em></p>
<p align="justify"><em><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The problem is that entry 92C was inserted by Constitution eighty eighth amendment Act, 2003, s.4 which is yet not in force, date to be notified later.</font></em></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">That is exactly the problem; many officers, lawyers and judges believe that Entry 92C gives the Central Government the power to levy service tax, little realizing that entry 92C was to come into force from a date to be notified and the government never notified the date. So, 92C is out. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">In an article for us in June 2009, the eminent senior advocate Arvind P Datar <a href="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/print_story.php?&newsid=9179" target="_blank"><strong>wrote</strong></a>, <em>"Interestingly, Entry 92C and Article 268A were inserted by the 88th Amendment to the Constitution. But both these have not been notified till date."</em></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">In the <em>Madras Hire Purchase Association case </em>- <strong><a href="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/subCatDesc.php3?subCatDisp_Id=43&filename=legal/hc/2009/2009-TIOL-338-HC-MAD-ST.htm" target="_blank">2009-TIOL-338-HC-MAD-ST</a></strong>, argued by Mr.Datar, the Madras High Court observed, <em>"Service tax is made by Parliament under Entry 92C of List I and Article 268-A… " </em></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">I asked Mr.Datar on this immediately after the High Court judgement was delivered. He told me, <em>"I had specifically argued that 92C and 268A had not been notified; we are moving the Supreme Court against this order."</em> He did and the Supreme Court in <a href="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/subCatDesc.php3?subCatDisp_Id=42&filename=legal/sc/2010/2010-TIOL-87-SC-ST-LB.htm" target="_blank"><strong>2010-TIOL-87-SC-ST-LB</strong> </a>observed, <em>"this Court has on three different occasions upheld the levy of service with reference to Entry 97 of List I in the face of challenges to the competence of the Parliament based on the entries in List II and on all the three occasions, <strong>this Court has held that the levy of service tax falls within Entry 97 of List I.</strong>" </em></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">So, Service Tax is levied under the residual entry 97 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, and not under entry 92C as strongly believed by many. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Now the Constitution Amendment Bill to bring in GST specifically provides for omitting Entry 92C in the Seventh Schedule and Article 268A in the Constitution. Remember these provisions were never notified. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Why to omit the entries which were never notified? </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Select Committee of the Rajya Sabha answered that question: </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>The Committee is of the view that Entry 92C was inserted by the Constitution (Eighty-Eighth Amendment) Act, 2003 to empower the Union to impose service tax on certain services read with article 268A of the Constitution. </em></font></p>
<p align="justify"><em><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Notwithstanding, the service tax levied under the Finance Act, 1994 were continuing as such. The amendment was carried out in the Constitution but the provision was never brought into force. Since Parliament has enacted the said constitutional provision and as such the provision stands as the part of Constitution; unless it is omitted by a Constitution Amendment Act by Parliament, it will continue to sit in the Constitution. Therefore, it is necessary to omit the said provision to ward of any future doubts about GST. </font></em></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Entry 92C was brought in only in 2004, but there was service tax much before that - obviously under entry 97. If services could be taxed under entry 97, why bring in another entry 92C? </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Statement of Objects and Reasons for the 88th Amendment Act states: </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>At present, the item relating to "taxes on services" is not specifically mentioned in any entry either in the Union List or in the State List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Parliament has the exclusive power to make laws with respect to entry 97 of the Union List for any other matters not enumerated in List II or List III including any tax not mentioned in either of those Lists. In exercise of this power, the Central Government has periodically taxed certain services at the rate of five per cent. ad valorem. </em></font></p>
<p align="justify"><em><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The proposed amendment would help in significant augmentation of revenues of the States in accordance with the proposed law, and pave the way for eventual inclusion of services within the purview of State level VAT. </font></em></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The then Finance Minister Jaswant Singh told the Parliament, </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" style="background-color:#FFFF00" span="span"><em>In most developed countries goods and services are traded and taxed together. </em></font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><em>Taxation of services in India was started through the Union Budget of 1994-95 when it was levied with effect from July 1, 1994 on stockbrokers, general insurance and telephone services. </em></font></p>
<p align="justify"><em><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The power to levy tax on service is, however, not specifically mentioned either in the Union List or in the State List or in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Entry 97 of the Union List gives power to the Centre for levy and collection of any tax not mentioned in either List II or List III. At present, therefore, the Parliament has the power to levy and collect tax on services only as a residual taxation matter. In exercise of this power, the Central Government had periodically taxed selected services. </font></em></p>
<p align="justify"><em><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">This is a provision to include a tax measure in the Union List so that both the Centre and the States can collect it. The duty and the responsibility of levying the tax remains of the Union Government. </font></em></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">But after all these efforts, why was the amendment not notified? Waiting for GST? </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Actually I had answered this question in detail in <strong><a href="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/NewsDesc.php?MpoQSrPnM=MjQyMDM=" target="_blank">DDT 2648</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/NewsDesc.php?MpoQSrPnM=MjQyMjY=" target="_blank">2649</a></strong>. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Once again DDT thanks the netizens who enthusiastically answered the question - it was a sheer pleasure to go through the replies. </font></p>
<p align="center"><font color="#006600" size="3" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif"><strong><em><a name="f1"></a>Customs - Procedure for Removal of EGM Error </em></strong></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>AS </strong>per Section 41 of the Customs Act, 1962, the person-in-charge of a conveyance carrying export goods shall, before departure of the conveyance from a Customs station, deliver to the proper officer in the case of a vessel or aircraft, an export manifest, and in the case of a vehicle, an export report, in the prescribed form. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">It seems that a large number of shipping bills processed at the Indian Customs EDI (Electronic Data interchange) System get stuck either because of wrong or incorrect entry of the Airway Bill Number at the time of Goods Registration of export cargo, or due to incorrect feeding of data in the ICES EDI system either at the service centre or at ICEGATE. Further, it is observed that 'L' i.e LEO error occurs when the system is down or slow and print is delayed but LEO had been given and this needs to be cleared in the ICE gate forcefully with update. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Commissioner of Customs, Air cargo Complex, Mumbai informs in a Public Notice that in order to facilitate quick removal of EGM Errors in the EDI System, henceforth Error L i.e., LEO Error will be removed by the Batch Officer posted in Export Shed. The representative of the Airline/CHA should approach the Batch Officer with the request letter for removal of Error L i.e., LEO Error and thereafter the Batch Officer will remove the error in the EDI system after verifying the details in the S/Bill and the EGM. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><a href="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/notDesc.php?MpoQSrPnM=MjA0NzE=" target="_blank"><strong><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Mumbai Air Cargo Complex Commissioner Public Notice No.34/2016., Dated: September 03 2016 </font></strong></a></p>
<p align="center"><font size="3" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif"><strong><em><font color="#006600"><a name="f2"></a>Police to Upload FIRs on website - Supreme Court </font></em></strong></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>IN </strong>a significant judgment yesterday, the Supreme Court ordered: </font></p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong><font size="3">+ </font></strong>The copies of the FIRs, unless the offence is sensitive in nature, like sexual offences, offences pertaining to insurgency, terrorism and of that category, offences under POCSO Act and such other offences, should be uploaded on the police website, and if there is no such website, on the official website of the State </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong><font size="3">+</font></strong> Government, within twenty-four hours of the registration of the First Information Report so that the accused or any person connected with the same can download the FIR and file appropriate application before the Court as per law for redressal of his grievances. It may be clarified here that in case there is connectivity problems due to geographical location or there is some other unavoidable difficulty, the time can be extended up to forty-eight hours. The said 48 hours can be extended maximum up to 72 hours and it is only relatable to connectivity problems due to geographical location. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">+</font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></font></strong><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> The decision not to upload the copy of the FIR on the website shall not be taken by an officer below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police or any person holding equivalent post. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong><font size="3">+ </font></strong>If an FIR is not uploaded, needless to say, it shall not enure per se a ground to obtain the benefit under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. (anticipatory bail) </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong><font size="3">+</font></strong> The directions for uploading of FIR in the website of all the States shall be given effect from 15th November, 2016. </font></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="center"><font size="3" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif"><strong><em><font color="#006600"><a name="f3"></a>Anti Dumping Duty on Para Nitroaniline - Extended </font></em></strong></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>GOVERNMENT</strong> had imposed anti dumping duty on Para Nitroaniline, originating in, or exported from, People's Republic of Chinaby Notification No. 88/2011-Cus, dated 09.09.2011. The anti dumping duty would have expired today. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">On the recommendation of the designated authority, the government has now extended it till 8th day of September 2017. Just In Time! </font></p>
<p align="justify"><a href="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/notDesc.php?MpoQSrPnM=MjA0NzA=" target="_blank"><strong><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Notification No. 49/2016-Customs(ADD)., Dated: September 07 2016 </font></strong></a></p>
<p align="center"><font size="3" face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif"><em><strong><font color="#006600"><a name="f4"></a>Bakrid Holiday on 13th instead of 12th </font></strong></em></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>IT </strong>has been decided to shift the Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid) holiday to 13th September, 2016 in place of 12th September, 2016 as notified earlier, for all Central Government administrative offices at Delhi / New Delhi. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">For Offices outside Delhi / New Delhi the Employees Coordination Committees or Head of Offices (where such Committees are not functioning) can decide the date depending upon the decision of the concerned State Government. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><a href="http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/notDesc.php?MpoQSrPnM=MjA0Njk=" target="_blank"><strong><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">DoPT office Memorandum in F.N0.12/11/2016-JCA2., Dated: September 06 2016</font></strong></a></p>
<table width="70%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="2" bgcolor="#009900">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#E1E9EC">
<div align="justify">
<p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Don't stress, <br>
</font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Relax, <br>
</font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Let life roll off<br>
</font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Your backs <br>
</font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Except for death and paying taxes, <br>
</font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Everything in life is only for now! </font></p>
</div></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="justify"><font color="#FF6666" size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Until Tomorrow with more <strong>DDT</strong></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font color="#FF6666" size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Have a nice day.</strong></font></p>
<p align="justify"><font color="#FF6666" size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Mail your comments to <a href="mailto:vijaywrite@tiol.in" target="_blank"><strong>vijaywrite@tiol.in</strong></a></font></p>
</body>
</html>